Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) has issued a declaratory order confirming that no approval under Section 203 of the Federal Power Act (“FPA”) is required in connection with the transfer or issuance of passive tax equity interests in public utilities or public utility holding companies.
Under Section 203, FERC’s prior authorization is required “if a public utility wishes to sell, lease or otherwise dispose of jurisdictional facilities,” which, as FERC previously ruled, includes a transfer of control over such facilities. FERC has now confirmed that passive tax equity interests do not constitute voting securities, and thus do not grant their holder control, for the purposes of Section 203 analysis.
FERC identified the following key characteristics of a passive tax equity ownership interest: (1) the ownership interest does not give its holder the authority to manage or control the day-to-day operations or a jurisdictional facility; (2) the rights of the passive equity investors are limited, generally to consent/veto rights designed protects their economic investment; and (3) the tax equity investor has a principal business other than that of producing, selling or transmitting electric power.
FERC had previously ruled in AES Creative Resources, L.P. et al., 129 FERC ¶ 61,239 (2009) that such interests do not grant their holders control for the purposes of the FPA Section 205 market power analysis, but has not until now expressly extended its holding to Section 203. The decision should bring additional clarity in determining whether a transaction requires Section 203 approval, and reduce the number of “abundance of caution” filings. The order also confirmed that the acquisition of such tax equity interests by a holding company qualifies for blanket authorization under FERC’s regulations at 18 C.F.R. § 33.1(c)(2)(i) .
The order can be seen here.
This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney.
This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary.
The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites.
In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.